The World's Mega 1% of the Wealthy are Creating more Emissions than the Poorest 66%...

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,780
Reaction score
4,577
I was given this article that is daming of the top 1% of the world's wealthiest people. They are plundering our earth for today...


The richest 1% of humanity is responsible for more carbon emissions than the poorest 66%, with dire consequences for vulnerable communities and global efforts to tackle the climate emergency, a report says.

Using a “mortality cost” formula – used by the US Environmental Protection Agency, among others – of 226 excess deaths worldwide for every million tonnes of carbon, the report calculates that the emissions from the 1% alone would be enough to cause the heat-related deaths of 1.3 million people over the coming decades.

The report finds that it would take about 1,500 years for someone in the bottom 99% to produce as much carbon as the richest billionaires do in a year.

The super-rich are plundering and polluting the planet to the point of destruction and it is those who can least afford it who are paying the highest price,” said Chiara Liguori, Oxfam’s senior climate justice policy adviser. The twin crises of climate and inequality were “fuelling one another”, she said.


The corporate shares of many super-rich are highly polluting. This elite also wield enormous and growing political power by owning media organisations and social networks, hiring advertising and PR agencies and lobbyists, and mixing socially with senior politicians, who are also often members of the richest 1%, according to the report.

In the US, for example, one in four members of Congress reportedly own stocks in fossil fuel companies, worth a total of between $33m and $93m. The report says this helps to explain why global emissions continue to rise, and why governments in the global north provided $1.8tn to subsidise the fossil fuel industry in 2020, contrary to their international pledges to phase out carbon emissions.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,780
Reaction score
4,577
We need a war to bring income inequality back in line ... The graph show became fair after WW2...


World War II sharply reduced income and wealth inequality in many countries. This column, part of a Vox debate on the economics of WWII, describes how various factors converged to produce this outcome. Mass mobilisation raised demand for labour and reduced skill premiums, extremely high marginal tax rates cut into elite incomes and fortunes, aggressive government intervention curtailed corporate and investment profits and sought to protect workers, consumers, and renters. Returns of capital fell as international markets suffered interruptions and physical assets risked confiscation or destruction. Communist regimes expanded their reach. In market economies, the war experience promoted reforms regarding social welfare, unionisation and taxation that sustained several decades of greater equality.

Figure 1 Top 1% income shares in four countries, 1935-1975 (% of income).

1701297765279.png
 

rittmeister

trekkie in residence
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
5,246
Reaction score
3,480
We need a war to bring income inequality back in line ... The graph show became fair after WW2...


World War II sharply reduced income and wealth inequality in many countries. This column, part of a Vox debate on the economics of WWII, describes how various factors converged to produce this outcome. Mass mobilisation raised demand for labour and reduced skill premiums, extremely high marginal tax rates cut into elite incomes and fortunes, aggressive government intervention curtailed corporate and investment profits and sought to protect workers, consumers, and renters. Returns of capital fell as international markets suffered interruptions and physical assets risked confiscation or destruction. Communist regimes expanded their reach. In market economies, the war experience promoted reforms regarding social welfare, unionisation and taxation that sustained several decades of greater equality.

Figure 1 Top 1% income shares in four countries, 1935-1975 (% of income).

View attachment 14547
you nead a graph beyond 1975
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,780
Reaction score
4,577
We all since the adoption of Neoliberal economics in 1980s, inequality has been on the rise in the WEST as well as many other places in the world...
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,780
Reaction score
4,577
Look how cheap China has gotten EV cars prices down to... it you watch the video our EV makers forgot the little guys...

 
Top