The Brides of Jamestown( Tobacco Brides )...

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
18,072
Reaction score
5,794
Jamestown was founded by men but it was women who civilized the men. The women were brought to America by the Virginia company...

.

In 1619, 90 young single women from England went to Jamestown to become wives of the men there, with the women being auctioned off for 150 pounds of tobacco each (to be paid to the shipping company), as that was the cost of each woman's travel to America.[1] All 90 of them did indeed become wive

Here are more details of the event...

https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1708/jamestown-brides/

Even so, the ratio of male-to-female in the colony remained approximately 7-1. Men were leaving the colony to marry Native American brides or were returning to England to marry and many more, of course, were dying in the war, from malnutrition, or from disease. In 1611, Sir Thomas Dale arrived and instituted his famously strict laws which prohibited marriage to natives, but this does not seem to have stopped the constant turnover of the male population.

Sandys had leaflets posted across England and printed in papers advertising the new program. The advertisements emphasized the good life awaiting women in Virginia and the guarantee of marriage to a man of means. The Records of the Virginia Company make clear that women were free to choose their own mates and would not be compelled to marry anyone they found disagreeable.

Of the more than 150 women who participated in the Jamestown Brides program only a little more than 30 lived to see their sixth year in the colony

Records of the time show that women could refuse to recite the standard vows of marriage, could make and break business contracts and marriage arrangements, and widows could own and manage their husband’s estates. The Jamestown brides who survived their early years in the colony became the respectable women of the Virginia Colony and, in a number of cases, were able to realize the dream of owning their own home and directing their own lives.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
18,072
Reaction score
5,794
Here is more on the brides... Colony Leaders did not want the men to take native wives...


The Virginia Company advertised that if English women agreed to come to Jamestown in search of a husband, the company would loan them clothing, transportation and a plot of land. In Jamestown, they could have their pick of wealthy bachelors. Once they chose a husband, he would reimburse the Virginia Company for her expenses with 120 to 150 pounds of “good leaf” tobacco.

Little is know about the first group of 90 brides, but Egloff says that some of the 56 women in the second group had lost both of their parents, meaning that they didn’t have a good chance of amassing a suitable dowry to entice a husband. At least 16 women in this second group had worked “in service” to other English households in order to amass a dowry, meaning that they hadn’t had a good one in the first place.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
18,072
Reaction score
5,794
It seems they found the the Lost Colony of Roanoke in the DNA... @diane

.

Through meticulous DNA analysis and comparison with genetic material from historical artifacts and human remains found at the original colony site, scientists have stumbled upon a remarkable revelation - a genetic link exists, indicating the presence of living descendants of the long-lost colonists. The findings suggest that some of the Roanoke colonists may have integrated into the local Native American communities, becoming a part of their societies and passing on their genetic heritage through the generations. This insight into their fate offers a glimpse into a chapter of history that has long been murky at best.
 

rittmeister

trekkie in residence
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
5,642
Reaction score
3,741
It seems they found the the Lost Colony of Roanoke in the DNA... @diane

.

Through meticulous DNA analysis and comparison with genetic material from historical artifacts and human remains found at the original colony site, scientists have stumbled upon a remarkable revelation - a genetic link exists, indicating the presence of living descendants of the long-lost colonists. The findings suggest that some of the Roanoke colonists may have integrated into the local Native American communities, becoming a part of their societies and passing on their genetic heritage through the generations. This insight into their fate offers a glimpse into a chapter of history that has long been murky at best.
i had never heard about that of course - does it mean those 'savages' took them in, saved their lives and fucked them?


... and btw, paging our resident expert on 'savages' - @diane
 

rittmeister

trekkie in residence
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
5,642
Reaction score
3,741
Jamestown was founded by men but it was women who civilized the men. The women were brought to America by the Virginia company...

.

In 1619, 90 young single women from England went to Jamestown to become wives of the men there, with the women being auctioned off for 150 pounds of tobacco each (to be paid to the shipping company), as that was the cost of each woman's travel to America.[1] All 90 of them did indeed become wive

Here are more details of the event...

https://www.worldhistory.org/article/1708/jamestown-brides/

Even so, the ratio of male-to-female in the colony remained approximately 7-1. Men were leaving the colony to marry Native American brides or were returning to England to marry and many more, of course, were dying in the war, from malnutrition, or from disease. In 1611, Sir Thomas Dale arrived and instituted his famously strict laws which prohibited marriage to natives, but this does not seem to have stopped the constant turnover of the male population.

Sandys had leaflets posted across England and printed in papers advertising the new program. The advertisements emphasized the good life awaiting women in Virginia and the guarantee of marriage to a man of means. The Records of the Virginia Company make clear that women were free to choose their own mates and would not be compelled to marry anyone they found disagreeable.

Of the more than 150 women who participated in the Jamestown Brides program only a little more than 30 lived to see their sixth year in the colony

Records of the time show that women could refuse to recite the standard vows of marriage, could make and break business contracts and marriage arrangements, and widows could own and manage their husband’s estates. The Jamestown brides who survived their early years in the colony became the respectable women of the Virginia Colony and, in a number of cases, were able to realize the dream of owning their own home and directing their own lives.
 

diane

that gal
Joined
Mar 18, 2020
Messages
2,686
Reaction score
3,259
I've always thought the people at Roanoke were absorbed by the people around them. Never have figured out why the predominate idea was calamity, especially violence. Seemed perfectly natural to me that the Indians would notice these folks having a big old hard time and suggest they come live with them. The Donner party may have had a better cuisine if they had not been so fearful of the Natives. The Washoe tried to help, even left food, but got shot at for their efforts!
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
18,072
Reaction score
5,794
Here is the Georgia story of colonial women... there were German settlers in Georgia... Salzburger...


Women were important in the settlement of colonial Georgia from its very beginning in 1733. The founding Trustees of the Georgia colony understood “how necessary a Part Women are in a family” and wanted them to fulfill their traditional roles. The tasks of men and women in a frontier society were complementary; the agricultural and charitable goals of the Georgia colony required both for labor and stability. Throughout the colonial period women migrated and settled with families and religious groups, or sometimes as individuals seeking a new start. They came as wives, mothers, daughters, or sometimes alone as indentured servants or enslaved workers. They were English, Salzburger, German, Scots, Irish, Sephardic Jews, and after 1750, African. Native American women also became part of the colonial fabric, although they did not come under the governance of the colonial government.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
18,072
Reaction score
5,794
The French and a young man without wives problem so the shipped a ship full of women to New Orleans They solve the problem by sending vampire wives call the "Casket Girls"...

.

In the 1700s, there were too many men and not enough women in France's Louisiana territory. So King Louis XIV devised a "solution."

These French girls, often sourced from France’s orphanages, schools, and convents (and sometimes prisons and brothels) were sent to settle in Louisiana and domesticate this wild land — and its wild settlers.


The word cassette morphed into casquette over time, and that translated to “casket.” History recorded these women as Casket Girls. The filles à la cassette were some of the original mothers of New Orleans. Here’s their story.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
18,072
Reaction score
5,794
List colony found ..

 

LJMYERS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2025
Messages
1,054
Reaction score
90
In my case it's Pocahontas and her family. Story goes they all went to St Michaels MD. A few returned to Carter Hall in Millwood VA just before the Civil War. It's all in this book. Pocahontas' family is depicted in this painting with King James Stuart and his son Charles.
 

Attachments

LJMYERS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2025
Messages
1,054
Reaction score
90
Yes we belong to St Michael's Anglican Church in Winchester VA. They existed way before Henry VIII. They started in Winchester England around the year 1000 by a bunch of Christian Romans. To this day they still say the Rosery. There is some sort of connection to Juda Ben-Hur. We will have Thanksgiving there. From the records of the Myers/Grundy family of the Fountain Maury Land Grant of Kentucky and US Attorney General Felix Grundy.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
18,072
Reaction score
5,794
There was child trafficking too...

Shipments of child indentured servants to Virginia were a significant, often forced, part of colonial labor, driven by tobacco's demands, with children as young as six "spirited away" or sent by desperate parents from England, bound by harsh contracts for years to work in tobacco fields, receiving only passage and basic needs in return for unpaid labor, a practice increasingly seen as involuntary servitude and eventually overshadowed by slavery.


In 1720, the law even made transportation more likely by authorizing payments to merchants who handled the transportations.3 Though the American Revolution forced a halt to transportation from England, before it ended, “approximately 52,200 convicts sailed for the colonies, more than 20,000 of them to Virginia. … An investigation of the skills held by one shipload of convicts revealed that of ninety-eight felons, forty-eight possessed no recognizable trade: sixteen of them were too young to have learned a trade”4 — in other words, children.
 

LJMYERS

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 2, 2025
Messages
1,054
Reaction score
90
and I think Prince Andrew is related to Jeffrey Epstein.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
18,072
Reaction score
5,794
Here is more on the vile act... @diane


Britain’s child migration has a long history. In 1618, a hundred children were sent from London to Virginia, now one of the United States of America, in one of Britain’s first cases of forced child migration.

The number of children being shipped overseas increased dramatically during the days of the British empire and continued after the Second World War. During the twentieth century, British children were sent to Canada, New Zealand, Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia) and Australia.


The Middlesex County Records of the 17th Century provide many examples of ‘spirits’ being prosecuted. On the 21st April 1655 it is recorded that Anne Shaddocke had to appear at court as she was suspected to be: ‘one that taketh up children to transport them to St Christopher’s Island [often called St Kitts today].’ In another example, Sarah Sharp appeared (4th May 1657), accused of being a ‘common taker up of children, and a setter to betray young men and maydens to be conveyed into shipps … she hath at this time fower persons aboard a ship whereof one is a child about eleven years of age, all to be transported to forrain parts as the barbadoes and Virginia.’ The records for 11th August 1662 also show how a young apprentice - Edmond Gregory - had been enticed away by a Robert Phage: ‘without the consent of his parents, freinds or master … to be transported beyond the seas to Virginia.’ Women were as much implicated in the practice of ‘spiriting’ as men and it was clearly lucrative.
 
Top