RE: Nathan Bedfor Forrest
Forrest's legacy is complicated, to say the least. While he achieved a number of victories against outnumbered or incompetent opponents, he really didn't have a big effect on the war as a whole. He got some good press, but he really didn't do much to hurt the United States war effort in the West. After the war, he was much more effective in achieving his goals when he led a terrorist organization devoted to suppressing black efforts to achieve equality and intimidating and murdering both black and white Republicans. There seems to be a cult-like following of Forrest these days, where supposedly his work as a white supremacist terrorist is "balanced" by his alleged conversion late in life. When we interrogate the sources, though, and critically evaluate what they actually say and their reliability, we find the alleged conversion to be somewhat lacking.
For example, much is made of his speech to the Independent Pole Bearers Association, even extending to the bizarre claim it shows he was an early civil rights advocate.
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83045160/1875-07-06/ed-1/seq-1.pdf
http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn83045160/1875-07-06/ed-1/seq-4.pdf
Forrest claims that almost all confederate soldiers were friends of black folks. They had a funny way of showing it. They were such friends they perpetrated terrorism to intimidate and murder blacks. The perpetrated atrocities on black soldiers who surrendered during the Civil War. Gideon Pillow also spoke at the meeting, urging blacks to disband all their political organizations because southern whites were their true friends. Forrest and Pillow were among the prominent white men the Pole Bearers invited to the picnic for peace and reconciliation.
All historical events have a context, and this is no exception.
The following month, Forrest wrote to Edmund W. Rucker, "our Election paste [sic] off quiet and for the Democratic party. The Civil Rights Bil [sic] has Setled [sic] the Republican party." In that same letter, he wrote, "the white people" need "only do as we have dun [sic] all work to gether [sic]." [quoted in Brian Steel Wills, A Battle From the Start: The Life of Nathan Bedford Forrest, p. 369]
Forrest had good reason to want blacks to believe he wanted reconciliation. "Living in a city whose only barbers were blacks, he had made it a postbellum practice never to patronize the same one twice in succession, lest a plot be hatched to slit his throat." [Jack Hurst, Nathan Bedford Forrest: A Biography, p. 366]
The 15th Amendment had been ratified five years earlier, the Civil Rights Act was passed nine years earlier, and a presidential election was coming up in the following year. Forrest was a staunch Democrat and surely wanted as many votes for Democrats as possible. What he was doing was recognizing what had already happened and was trying to turn it to political advantage. In fact, there's no evidence the man ever changed his mind. He wanted to control blacks. He didn't want them off doing their own thing. He couldn't do anything about giving them their civil rights because they already had them by law. He was looking to control their votes, and using the result of that vote to control them. He knew electing Democrats meant curtailing rights for blacks, and he was out to elect Democrats.
So his exploits on the battlefields need to be balanced against his actions before [slave trader] and after [terrorist] the war, and even his exploits on battlefields need to be scrutinized in terms of what he actually accomplished. If I were a confederate on horseback, I'd probably love being in his command, but if I wanted to win the war, as much "fun" as it would be with him, I think I'd choose to be with Hampton.