5fish
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2019
- Messages
- 10,699
- Reaction score
- 4,553
In Lee's report on Gettysburg, he refers to his wagons as for a reason why he choose to stay and engage the union army. He states it would have been to difficult to retire and move due to the wagons. I have read this in other writing on Gettysburg about these wagons.
Well I disagree, he had no problem retreating from Gettysburg with those same wagons. He executed one of the great retreats in history with those wagons over the same roads he would have used if he had choose to retire or move from Gettysburg, instead of engaging the union army.
I think we have caught Lee making an excuse(yes, an excuse) for why he was forced to engage the union army at Gettysburg due to the wagons.
He argues its the wagons that force him to stay and fight at Gettysburg but in the end he had no problem retreating from Gettysburg with those same wagons.
I think these wagons are a half harted try by Lee to excuse why he choose to engage the union army on ground he did not chose.
Lee makes an excuse!
Well I disagree, he had no problem retreating from Gettysburg with those same wagons. He executed one of the great retreats in history with those wagons over the same roads he would have used if he had choose to retire or move from Gettysburg, instead of engaging the union army.
I think we have caught Lee making an excuse(yes, an excuse) for why he was forced to engage the union army at Gettysburg due to the wagons.
He argues its the wagons that force him to stay and fight at Gettysburg but in the end he had no problem retreating from Gettysburg with those same wagons.
I think these wagons are a half harted try by Lee to excuse why he choose to engage the union army on ground he did not chose.
Lee makes an excuse!