Jacksonian Democracy led to Secession...

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
I argue that Jacksonian Democracy could square its principles of state rights and slavery with the idea of the perpetual union.


Nullification was incompatible

“I consider, then, the power to annul a law of the United States, assumed by one State, incompatible with the existence of the Union, contradicted expressly by the letter of the Constitution, unauthorized by its spirit, inconsistent with every principle on which It was founded, and destructive of the great object for which it was formed,” Jackson said.

The truth about nullification...

After the deal was struck, Jackson wrote to the Rev. A.J. Crawford in May 1833 that the tariff issue was a “pretext” and that the goals of the nullifiers were “disunion and southern confederacy” and “the next pretext will be the negro, or slavery question."

Jackson censored the mail... federal's job to protect the mail...

Jackson and his postmaster general allowed local southern officials to intercept and destroy the literature. The President also asked Congress to pass a “law as will prohibit, under severe penalties, the circulation in the southern States, through the mail, of incendiary publications intended to instigate the slaves to insurrection.” The bill never passed.

Blaming Abolitionist....

In his farewell address, Jackson addressed both of these situations. The outgoing President spoke about sectionalism in blunt terms. “We behold systematic efforts publicly made to sow the seeds of discord between different parts of the United States and to place party divisions directly upon geographical distinctions; to excite the South against the North and the North against the South, and to force into the controversy the most delicate and exciting topics--topics upon which it is impossible that a large portion of the Union can ever speak without strong emotion,” Jackson wrote.


State Rights...

However, Jackson also reinforced the concept of state sovereignty and the ability of people within states to control their own destiny. “All efforts on the part of people of other States to cast odium upon their institutions, and all measures calculated to disturb their rights of property or to put in jeopardy their peace and internal tranquility, are in direct opposition to the spirit in which the Union was formed, and must endanger its safety,” Jackson argued.

In the end...

More loosely, it alludes to the entire range of democratic reforms that proceeded alongside the Jacksonians’ triumph—from expanding the suffrage to restructuring federal institutions. From another angle, however, Jacksonianism appears as a political impulse tied to slavery, the subjugation of Native Americans, and the celebration of white supremacy—so much so that some scholars have dismissed the phrase “Jacksonian Democracy” as a contradiction in terms.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
Here Jackson slavery stance...


While Jackson certainly did not seem to harbor any internal conflict on the morality of slavery, it did appear as if he believed he was acting with the Union's best interest in mind. He despised abolitionists and believed that they were in favor of dismantling the union. [1] When slavery did rear its head, Jackson sought to remove it from the public eye. For example, when some abolitionists began to spread anti-slavery tracts through the mail in 1835, Jackson supported a solution from Postmaster General Amos Kendall, who wished to grant southern state officials the power to ban the tracts.

snip...

Jackson's support of slavery is a blemish on his record of standing up for the common man. Without even addressing the clear immorality of slavery, as an institution, it heavily benefited elite upper classes. It provided a cheap alternative to labor from free men (the people Jackson claimed to support), and its existence enabled plantation owners to continue building their wealth while spending next to nothing on labor. In dealing with slavery, Jackson still took numerous stands against the federal government, which was par for his course. However, instead of fighting on behalf of the common man, he fought for individual state rights. He saw state autonomy as the best way to protect the Union but did not properly recognize slavery as a tool of the elite
 

Jim Klag

Ike the moderator
Staff member
Moderator
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
3,690
Reaction score
2,296
Here Jackson slavery stance...


While Jackson certainly did not seem to harbor any internal conflict on the morality of slavery, it did appear as if he believed he was acting with the Union's best interest in mind. He despised abolitionists and believed that they were in favor of dismantling the union. [1] When slavery did rear its head, Jackson sought to remove it from the public eye. For example, when some abolitionists began to spread anti-slavery tracts through the mail in 1835, Jackson supported a solution from Postmaster General Amos Kendall, who wished to grant southern state officials the power to ban the tracts.

snip...

Jackson's support of slavery is a blemish on his record of standing up for the common man. Without even addressing the clear immorality of slavery, as an institution, it heavily benefited elite upper classes. It provided a cheap alternative to labor from free men (the people Jackson claimed to support), and its existence enabled plantation owners to continue building their wealth while spending next to nothing on labor. In dealing with slavery, Jackson still took numerous stands against the federal government, which was par for his course. However, instead of fighting on behalf of the common man, he fought for individual state rights. He saw state autonomy as the best way to protect the Union but did not properly recognize slavery as a tool of the elite
In the 1830's, whether we talk about Jackson or any other politician, the common man was white - period. Also, states' rights was not the divisive issue it is in the 21st century and was not associated with racism as it is today.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
Here is another spark...

Finally, Jacksonian democracy sparked a women’s rights movement. This reform movement worked to give equal rights to American women, especially the right to vote. It formally began in 1848 at a meeting at Seneca Falls, New York. This gathering of approximately one hundred women and men voted to support a Declaration of Women’s Rights. Among the rights called for by the Seneca Falls Declaration was women’s suffrage or the right to vote. Two of the most important leaders of this women’s rights movement were Elizabeth Cady Stanton and Susan B. Anthony. Both of these women continued their activities on behalf of equal rights for American women after the Civil War.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
It gave fire to Abolitionist... IMHOP


snip...

President Andrew Jackson banned the post office from delivering Abolitionist literature in the south. A "GAG RULE" was passed on the floor of the House of Representatives forbidding the discussion of bills that restricted slavery.

snip...

These new Abolitionists were different from their forebears. ANTI-SLAVERY SOCIETIES had existed in America since 1775, but these activists were more radical. Early Abolitionists called for a gradual end to slavery. They supported compensation to owners of slaves for their loss of property. They raised money for the purchase of slaves to grant freedom to selected individuals.

snip...

The new Abolitionists thought differently. They saw slavery as a blight on America. It must be brought to an end immediately and without compensation to the owners. They sent petitions to Congress and the states, campaigned for office, and flooded the south with inflammatory literature.

snip...

Abolitionists were always a minority, even on the eve of the Civil War. Their dogged determination to end human bondage was a struggle that persisted for decades. While mostly peaceful at first, as each side became more and more firmly rooted, pens were exchanged for swords. Another seed of sectional conflict had been deeply planted.
 

Mike12

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
524
Reaction score
9
How discouraging! Anything Jefferson Davis liked is the central problem? Maybe why it is taught. Jefferson praised unabashedly President-General Andrew Jackson, the case of that Nullification Crisis. Jefferson praised unabashedly Vice President Calhoun of that administration on his doctrine in the Nullification Crisis. Jefferson Davis wanted the Congress to remember that occurrence is why they remember it.

A Hungry Government is happy to presuppose that without the Democracy of delineation, station, states, assemblies, separations of powers, in a great Spanish Empire, oh wait whats that, they're responsible for 90% of slavery and All its genocides, and a million perished alone in a rotating ritual called Haiti.
 

Leftyhunter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2020
Messages
1,303
Reaction score
302
How discouraging! Anything Jefferson Davis liked is the central problem? Maybe why it is taught. Jefferson praised unabashedly President-General Andrew Jackson, the case of that Nullification Crisis. Jefferson praised unabashedly Vice President Calhoun of that administration on his doctrine in the Nullification Crisis. Jefferson Davis wanted the Congress to remember that occurrence is why they remember it.

A Hungry Government is happy to presuppose that without the Democracy of delineation, station, states, assemblies, separations of powers, in a great Spanish Empire, oh wait whats that, they're responsible for 90% of slavery and All its genocides, and a million perished alone in a rotating ritual called Haiti.
My friend if you could sell whatever your smoking you would be a millionaire.
Leftyhunter
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
How discouraging! Anything Jefferson Davis liked is the central problem? Maybe why it is taught. Jefferson praised unabashedly President-General Andrew Jackson, the case of that Nullification Crisis. Jefferson praised unabashedly Vice President Calhoun of that administration on his doctrine in the Nullification Crisis. Jefferson Davis wanted the Congress to remember that occurrence is why they remember it.

A Hungry Government is happy to presuppose that without the Democracy of delineation, station, states, assemblies, separations of powers, in a great Spanish Empire, oh wait whats that, they're responsible for 90% of slavery and All its genocides, and a million perished alone in a rotating ritual called Haiti.
You are taking a swat at big government and rolling into Spanish for slavery and genocide of the Indians and a swat Blacks in Haiti... Your simplicity and corruption of the English language is frighting...


It does not matter who Jefferson like or not...
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
The Jefferson did not care for Jackson...


Thomas Jefferson on Andrew Jackson
Posted on March 14, 2012 by Patrick Lee
I feel much alarmed at the prospect of seeing General Jackson President. He is one of the most unfit men I know of for such a place. He has had very little respect for laws and constitutions, and is, in fact, an able military chief. His passions are terrible. When I was President of the Senate, he was Senator; and he could never speak on account of the rashness of his feelings. I have seen him attempt it repeatedly, and as often choke with rage. His passions are, no doubt, cooler now; he has been much tried since I knew him, but he is a dangerous man.
Daniel Webster’s Interview With Jefferson,” 1824, 4060
 

Mike12

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
524
Reaction score
9
You are taking a swat at big government and rolling into Spanish for slavery and genocide of the Indians and a swat Blacks in Haiti... Your simplicity and corruption of the English language is frighting...


It does not matter who Jefferson like or not...
OK well.. Jefferson Davis was President of the Confederacy... I see the article argues Andrew Jackson's Democracy does NOT lead to secession? The title is misleading?
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
Jefferson Davis was President of the Confederacy..
Yes, I know this...

I see the article argues Andrew Jackson's Democracy does NOT lead to secession? The title is misleading?
I will give you a half point but the Whig party and the Jacksonian's could not reconcile slavery, state rights with preserving the union. It seems you could not support slavery and keep the union...
 
Top