5fish
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2019
- Messages
- 17,384
- Reaction score
- 5,747
You do not need the confiscation of wealth in most cases a few changes in laws can be balanced to the economic system. Today Stock Buybacks must end or be redistribute to the employees equally in the company as bonuses, this one change would correct so much inequality. The ownership of land should be 99 year leases from the government and the fees from these leases redistributed to the all the citizens. You just need changes in the laws to mudge society in the right direction. Chesterton was right here were his changes....
G.K. Chesterton did suggest that only a few key laws would have to change for distributism to work, as the current pervasive system of property concentration was largely maintained by specific existing laws. He argued that if these key legal "stumbling blocks" were removed, a society of widespread property ownership would naturally re-emerge based on common sense and human nature. Specific legislative changes Chesterton and other distributists advocated included:
Taxation of contracts: Implementing a system that would discourage the sale of small properties to large corporations and encourage the break-up of large properties among small owners.
Free law for the poor: Ensuring that small property owners could afford to defend their property rights in court against wealthy entities.
Protective tariffs and subsidies: Deliberately protecting small, local experiments in property ownership, if necessary, through mechanisms like local tariffs and subsidies.
Destruction of primogeniture: Advocating for something like the Napoleonic testamentary law to prevent the concentration of land in a single heir, thereby encouraging distribution among family members.
Chesterton believed the existing laws favored monopolies and the concentration of wealth, thereby creating an artificial "proletarianism". By altering these specific laws, he aimed to restore a system where widespread private property ownership was the norm, allowing people a genuine choice between wage labor and self-employment.
G.K. Chesterton did suggest that only a few key laws would have to change for distributism to work, as the current pervasive system of property concentration was largely maintained by specific existing laws. He argued that if these key legal "stumbling blocks" were removed, a society of widespread property ownership would naturally re-emerge based on common sense and human nature. Specific legislative changes Chesterton and other distributists advocated included:
Taxation of contracts: Implementing a system that would discourage the sale of small properties to large corporations and encourage the break-up of large properties among small owners.
Free law for the poor: Ensuring that small property owners could afford to defend their property rights in court against wealthy entities.
Protective tariffs and subsidies: Deliberately protecting small, local experiments in property ownership, if necessary, through mechanisms like local tariffs and subsidies.
Destruction of primogeniture: Advocating for something like the Napoleonic testamentary law to prevent the concentration of land in a single heir, thereby encouraging distribution among family members.
Chesterton believed the existing laws favored monopolies and the concentration of wealth, thereby creating an artificial "proletarianism". By altering these specific laws, he aimed to restore a system where widespread private property ownership was the norm, allowing people a genuine choice between wage labor and self-employment.
Last edited:



