Cheaper to attack or defend in war...

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
16,097
Reaction score
5,663
It is cheaper to attack or defend in war...


This 2:1 ratio of defense to offense played out again over the weekend as Iran unleashed a combination of drones, cruise missiles, and ballistic missiles at Israeli territory. Thankfully, the attack was mostly thwarted through the combined efforts of multiple countries and multiple defensive systems.


Generally, the idea is that proactivity (a strong offensive action) instead of a passive attitude will preoccupy the opposition and ultimately hinder its ability to mount an opposing counterattack, leading to a strategic advantage.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
16,097
Reaction score
5,663
  • The Philippine-American War (1899-1902) cost the U.S. government approximately $400 million.
  • Total U.S. war expenditures up to the end of 1943 were approximately $296 billion (current dollars at the time).
The Civil War's estimated total cost was approximately $6.64 billion, with the Union spending about $3.36 billion and the Confederacy about $3.28 billion. Another estimate places the Union's direct cost at over $3 billion, with the U.S. government's debt rising to $2.6 billion by 1865.

The United States' direct cost for World War I was around $22.6 billion to $32 billion, depending on the source and calculation method. Some sources provide a figure of $32 billion, which equates to about 52% of the U.S. gross national product at the time, while others state a figure closer to $22.6 billion for war spending

 
Top