O' Be Joyful
ohio hillbilly
- Joined
- May 12, 2019
- Messages
- 3,491
- Reaction score
- 3,136
What he wrote was not memos.
That was my point.
What he wrote was not memos.
All the "Captain of History" gig does is shut down discussion.
So here we are, once again more than two or three thoughts in a row. I have to say that given your approach, you'll not relate to this response either,
it's either/or vs. neither/nor.I have to say that given your approach, you'll not relate to this response either, and neither
for which he got a nobel prize in literature, you nOObUnlike his own personal bloviations.
Bingo....In writing full histories, every detail is important.
No, it was...And btw, it's either/or vs. neither/nor.
...given your approach, you'll not relate to this response either, and neither would you have accepted a heads-up...
Your quote below:No. It was:
We're not writing history, genius. We are discussing finite topics. Succinct precision is de rigueur. If you need a translation I will happily oblige.Bingo.
Where does that leave "better served by succinct precision."
We're not writing history, genius. We are discussing finite topics. Succinct precision is de rigueur. If you need a translation I will happily oblige.
Bingus maximus, I think.How is Bingo pronounced in Latin?
I think.
Oui.cogito ergo sum
Well first of all it was a straight-up phrase, regardless of what anyone may have called it, and second of all neither do I see an either or a nor in the phrase, meh....I do not see an either or a nor in the above, so-called phrase.
Well first of all it was a straight-up phrase, regardless of what anyone may have called it, and second of all neither do I see an either or a nor in the phrase, meh.
You know, if we can tear ourselves from the riveting high drama of proper usage for just a moment, do you feel that the fact of Canadian slavery (as stated in the OP) rightly bolsters the claim of today's Lost Cause that the CW wasn't over slavery because all of North America had practiced slavery at some point?
no prob - succinct precision (if used precisely) keeps text succinct, don't you cink?Bingo.
Where does that leave "better served by succinct precision."
That is one approach, yes.We're not writing history, genius. We are discussing finite topics...
define thought pleaseOthers can handle more than two or three thoughts at a time, and embrace a more infinite opportunity, free to consider all historical aspects and settings to arrive at a better-informed conclusion.
Sure. the defined thought beingdefine thought please
...Others can handle more than two or three thoughts at a time, and embrace the more infinite opportunity, to consider all historical aspects and settings to arrive at a better-informed conclusion...
hohwash?the defined thought being
That is a philosophical question, and perhaps we require a separate sub-forum, yes?Sure. the defined thought being