Best tanks of WWII

Kirk's Raider's

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,251
Reaction score
922
How about one Tiger vs 50 T- 34... watch the video... It took 67 hits from the Russians...

On July 8th, 1943, a Tiger tank commanded by Franz Staudegger took on fifty attacking T-34 tanks as the only armored vehicle on its side (though it did have infantry support), destroying twenty-seven enemy tanks and forcing the remainder to break off their attack and fall back. Staudegger's Tiger then itself ran out of armor-piercing ammunition and retreated behind the lines, but it had stopped the Soviet attack.

In the summer of 1941 General Guerdian declared that the T-34 was the best tank in the world with it's sloped armor giving very good protection, good cross country performance especially as it could travel through the Pipet Marsh's and it's powerful for the time 76mm gun.
By the time the Tiger was introduced it was at a severe disadvantage in terms of armor and fire power. The Soviet answer was the T-34/85 with it's 85mm gun on par with the German 88mm.
Unfortunately they were not available during the battle of Kursk.
Kirk's Raiders
 

rittmeister

trekkie in residence
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
5,210
Reaction score
3,458
In the summer of 1941 General Guerdian declared that the T-34 was the best tank in the world with it's sloped armor giving very good protection, good cross country performance especially as it could travel through the Pipet Marsh's and it's powerful for the time 76mm gun.
By the time the Tiger was introduced it was at a severe disadvantage in terms of armor and fire power. The Soviet answer was the T-34/85 with it's 85mm gun on par with the German 88mm.
Unfortunately they were not available during the battle of Kursk.
Kirk's Raiders
ffs, it's guderian, and those guns were not on par
 
Last edited:

Kirk's Raider's

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 16, 2019
Messages
2,251
Reaction score
922
ffs, it's guderian, and those guns were not on par
Per the Soviet tests at Kublinka the 85mm was more then adequate at armor penetration.
The Tiger Tank was certainly effective in a defensive role but even the mighty Konig or King Tiger suffered heavy losses at the battle Oldeglow in Poland. Guderian himself did declare that the T-34 was the best tank in the world at the time of it's introduction in June 1941. Yes the T-34 was eventually outclassed by the PzMIV Special and the Panther and Tiger Tanks that's why the Soviets upgraded to the T-34/85.
Leftyhunter
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
WE have to have the best German Tank killing pilots @Leftyhunter


The following list contains the German Stuka and other combat aircraft aces of World War II. The list is sorted by the number of combat missions flown.
 

Wehrkraftzersetzer

Hüter des Reinheitsgebotes
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1,173
WE have to have the best German Tank killing pilots @Leftyhunter


The following list contains the German Stuka and other combat aircraft aces of World War II. The list is sorted by the number of combat missions flown.
nope, that's not a question at all
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
German Tank crews fear this plane...


The Sturmovik was both respected and loathed by German pilots, infantrymen, and tankers. The Luftwaffe took to calling it the “Flying Tank,” “Concrete Plane,” or even “Iron Gustav” because of its highly effective armor protection, while German tankers and infantrymen referred to it as the “Butcher” or even the “Black Death” because of the destruction left in the wake of an Il-2 attack. The robust plane proved that it could more than hold its own against the vaunted Luftwaffe, especially as Soviet tactics improved and pilots gained experience against German flyers who became younger and the veterans fewer as the bloody “Great Patriotic War” pushed ever westward
 

rittmeister

trekkie in residence
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
5,210
Reaction score
3,458
The Greatest Armor Thinkers... Patton and Rommel are not on the list... @rittmeister not all German either...

neither rommel nor patton ever commanded a tank - they commanded units
monash as a tank commander is a bad joke
that's not a list of tankers, that's a list of what they have losely connected to the word tank

how about otto carius (top scoring tanker who survived the war)?
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
Here more on the Russian tank killer... it was a tank...



Nonetheless, attack planes like the Sturmovik could still disrupt armored attacks, blast entrenched troops and artillery, and strafe columns of soft-skinned trucks and light armor. While some estimate between five and 10 Il-2s were lost for every Axis tank they knocked out — and aircraft are generally more expensive to build than tanks! — ground-attack planes proved their value against unarmored targets, which were in abundance.

But Soviet commanders didn’t let the initial setback prevent them from feeding even more Sturmoviks into the battle. Il-2 pilots in Kursk began flying in “Circles of Death” over the battlefield to cover each other’s tails from enemy fighters, one aircraft at a time peeling away to make ground attack runs before rejoining the circle.


Here an air battle few to none talk about...

The Battle of Kursk actually began with one of the largest air battles of World War II, when German fighters scrambled just in time to blunt an enormous preemptive air strike by Soviet fighters and bombers. The aerial melee involved 500 warplanes and resulted in a few dozen German losses in exchange for around one hundred Soviet aircraft.

This is where I think these planes hurt the Germans...

Nonetheless, such was the desperation of the air war over the Eastern Front then that the Il-2 was frequently called upon to serve as a fighter. While the Sturmovik had no way of keeping pace with German fighters, it proved deadly in taking down slower German bomber, observation and transport planes, resulting in several Il-2 aces.
http://store.warisboring.com/?utm_source=Menu&utm_content=textlink
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
Here is this German Tanker... Wittmann... it helps when you hand pick your crews... @rittmeister

Captain Michael Wittmann – Led Germany’s most lethal tank attack of WWII – Captain Wittmann’s kill record includes 138 tanks, 132 antitank guns and a countless number of vehicles. He is most famous for an attack in June of 1944, when he devastated as many as 14 tanks, 2 antitank guns and 15 additional vehicles a 15 minute time frame.


He had a aimer name Woll for they were a team...

Woll received the Ritterkreuz as SS-Rottenfuhrer with 13th (heavy) Co., 1st SS-Pz Rgt., 1st SS-Pz. Div. “LSSAH”, Russian Front. He would finish the war with the rank of Oberscharfuhrer, which is equivalent to Sgt. 1st Class (or Tech Sgt. as it’s sometimes called) Woll was the only NCO tank gunner to receive the Knights Cross.

 

Leftyhunter

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 19, 2020
Messages
1,303
Reaction score
302
German Tank crews fear this plane...


The Sturmovik was both respected and loathed by German pilots, infantrymen, and tankers. The Luftwaffe took to calling it the “Flying Tank,” “Concrete Plane,” or even “Iron Gustav” because of its highly effective armor protection, while German tankers and infantrymen referred to it as the “Butcher” or even the “Black Death” because of the destruction left in the wake of an Il-2 attack. The robust plane proved that it could more than hold its own against the vaunted Luftwaffe, especially as Soviet tactics improved and pilots gained experience against German flyers who became younger and the veterans fewer as the bloody “Great Patriotic War” pushed ever westward
https://www.historynet.com/myth-of-...mination of the,against armor as many believe.
Aircraft weren't a significant threat to tanks until 1972 when US Army Helicopters armed with the then new TOW missile took out North Vietnamese tanks.
Aircraft could take out trucks and tanks require quite a bit of logistical support so airpower was an indirect threat to tanks.
Leftyhunter
 

rittmeister

trekkie in residence
Staff member
Administrator
Joined
May 12, 2019
Messages
5,210
Reaction score
3,458
https://www.historynet.com/myth-of-the-tankbuster.htm#:~:text=In a painting by Nicolas,at Falaise in August 1944.&text=A close examination of the,against armor as many believe.
Aircraft weren't a significant threat to tanks until 1972 when US Army Helicopters armed with the then new TOW missile took out North Vietnamese tanks.
Aircraft could take out trucks and tanks require quite a bit of logistical support so airpower was an indirect threat to tanks.
Leftyhunter
forcing enemy tankers into keeping their hatches down probably helped a lot
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
Maybe not since tankers have to do the same in active combat.
Leftyhunter
Here a Russian pilots... This guy sunk ships...


Soviet sources assert that Stepanyan flew no fewer than 239 combat sorties, sank 53 ships, thirteen of which he did alone, destroyed 80 tanks, 600 armored vehicles, and 27 aircraft. The cosmonaut Georgy Beregovoy flew the Ilyushin in 185 sorties, and was awarded the "Hero of the Soviet Union" in 1944.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
Here is an article about airplanes being fitted with tanks cannons... in WW2...


The idea of using planes to destroy tanks is not a new one. Although the concept has been perfected with modern aircraft like the popular A-10 Warthog, tank-killing planes flew not long after the invention of both vehicles. In WWII, tank and plane technology advanced rapidly. As tanks became more survivable with thicker armor, planes began carrying heavier and heavier ordnance to kill them. Eventually, armies decided that the best way to kill a tank and other ground targets with a plane was with a tank cannon. Here are four of those planes. Note that planes armed with flak guns like the German BK 3,7 3.7cm gun are not included.
 

5fish

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
10,700
Reaction score
4,554
Here is an interesting article about why the Allies did not developed tank killing planes. It was not flashy as shooting down other planes. @O' Be Joyful , @rittmeister , @Leftyhunter , @Wehrkraftzersetzer if you have an interest in tanks...


The effectiveness of anti-tank aircraft in World War II is taken for granted by most writers on the subject, offering a technophile orthodoxy that can be seamlessly woven together with accounts of later developments up to and including the Iraq wars. Luftwaffe legend Hans-Ulrich Rudel claimed to have destroyed 519 Soviet tanks, most of them while piloting a cannon-armed Junkers Ju-87G Panzerknäcker, or “tankbuster.” Aleksandr Yefimov, said to have destroyed 126 German tanks while flying the Ilyushin Il-2 Sturmovik, was twice made a Hero of the Soviet Union. Tales of their exploits helped to firmly establish a positive image of anti-tank aviation in histories of the conflict. But that image has little relation to the realities of close air support during the war.

That judgment is given additional weight by the attention the Germans gave to developing their own anti-tank aircraft. The Henschel Hs-129B-1/R2, a small, heavily armored single-seat twin with a 30mm gun, was introduced on the Eastern Front in late 1942. A handsome, strongly built airplane with unreliable French engines and the flying characteristics of a penguin, the Hs-129 was not popular with pilots. But at least two men, Rudolf-Heinz Ruffer and Hans-Hermann Steinkamp, claimed to have destroyed 70 or more Soviet tanks flying the type during the next two years
.
 
Top