And yet you believe that the privilege of choosing your dictators, is "consent" to government... so why complain, if you can just VOTE?
You have never presented any options to your system... You have not explain the system you want to use?And yet you believe that the privilege of choosing your dictators, is "consent" to government... so why complain, if you can just VOTE?
I've BEEN presenting it from square one.You have never presented any options to your system... You have not explain the system you want to use?
Let's parse this out... The states should run everything because they are less corrupt than the Federal government... You wanting Athenian Democracy at the state level... It could be done today due to the Internet...I've BEEN presenting it from square one.
But it's NOT an option; it's the de jure LAW, that:
1. Each state is a separate de jure sovereign nation,
2. that is supremely ruled by its respective ELECTORATE, while government officials are subordinate agents that they can overrule at will.
When the government usurped de facto national authority to the federal officials (and thus to their private-sector BENEFACTORS, i.e. Crony-Capitalists); then every state's respective voters were ROBBED of their consent to government, while being cult-brainwashed to BELIEVE that this insult was "government by the people" through some mental gymnastics involving lies and Operant Conditioning (like lab-rats pushing levers to get treats and avoid shocks).
THEN you complain about all the injustice, that you supposedly VOTED for.
I'm just stating the FACTS. Not arguing opinions, or there'd be no point.Let's parse this out... The states should run everything because they are less corrupt than the Federal government... You wanting Athenian Democracy at the state level... It could be done today due to the Internet...
What state power do you want states to have...Again, it IS the LAW..... as written and agreed in 1787-- and SUPRESSED, de facto ONLY, in the 1861 self-coup.
What state power do you want states to have...
You know Washington D.C. is the superior authority... You heard of transition of power... The King of England had absolute power but today the King of England has little to no power... It transition to parliament and the Prime minister and the people hold the power...Despite the absence of any superior authority to enforce such rules, international law is considered by states as binding upon them, and it is this fact which gives these rules the status of law.
What does this mean? States will not have governments... If you want states with all the power someone has to manage it...You're simply confusing "states," with state GOVERNMENTS